Wednesday, 24 February 2016

Gustav Fritsch: Travel writing and portrait photography in South Africa

Gustav Theodor Fritsch (5 March 1838 - 12 June 1927) was a German anatomist, anthropologist, traveler and physiologist from Cottbus. Fritsch studied natural science and medicine in Berlin, Breslou and Heidelberg and later became an associate professor of physiology at the University of Berlin, He was later appointed the head of the histological department at the physiological institute of the University of Berlin.

While being well known for his work with neuropsychiatrist Eduard Hitzig (1839 -1907), involving the localisation of the motor areas of the brain, he also did extensive ethnographical research in Southern Africa (1863-1866). His travel writing and portrait photography, and how they are presented, is interesting as his methodology shifts from ethnographic-cultural to anthropological-physical. This change in methodology causes his portraits to shift in meaning as well. This shift in portraiture meaning can also be seen as moving from the "honorific" to the "repressive" representation of the focus of his photographs, with the focus of photographs being the indigenous inhabitants of Southern Africa.

Fritsch's portrait photographs of, "Natives of South Africa", were taken between 1863 and 1866 and was published  in reconstituted form in 1872. His initial portraits and travel narrative were "honorific" in nature and their open-ended ethnographic emphasis related to an early racial liberalism. His portrait photography and narrative writing, shifted to the "repressive", emphasising the physical features which would constitute the 'racial types' in Southern Africa. The shift in the meaning and representation in his work is quite sudden, moving from cultural to physical within the span of a decade.

The reason for the sudden change in his approach to documenting the indigenous inhabitants of Southern Africa lies within the context of his academic pursuits and the newly established
Berlin  anthropological community within which he finds himself. More specifically, it is the integration within a newly institutionalised Germany, and particularly within the Berlin anthropological community, that his movement towards a new methodology within this intellectual context, causes him to move from an ethnographic-cultural to an anthropological-physical methodology.          

For further reading on Gustav Fritsch, his travel writing and portrait photographs of the individuals in his, "Natives of South Africa", the following link is quite helpful:                                                           http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/journal_archive/02590190/670.pdf           

7 comments:

  1. This is very interesting, and raises the question of the influence of a discipline on ideology. It would be great to hear more about the Berlin anthropological community, and its influence on Fritsch. Do you perhaps have any photos that could be shared here?
    Thanks Gustav!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed reading this and will be looking for some of his photographs of "Natives in South Africa".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its interesting to think of this within the context of my own exposure to South African history within Geography and especially within the context of post apartheid South Africa, what really stick with me was the shift from his photographs as “honorific" to the “repressive"shifting his focus from the cultural to the physical which can be seen as a precursor to a more racially focused European view of South Africa. Reay interesting to think about.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you to everyone for your interest and feedback on my little trivia/gossip entry. I will definitely post on the Berlin anthropological community and expand on its influence on Fritsch's, as soon as I am able to. I will also get as many photographs of Gustav's "Natives in South Africa" and post them within the coming week.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Adrian - Nice to "meet" you.
    I wondered whether you could say more about the discipline of Geography in this context? My understanding of the shift from "honorific" to "repressive" thinking is that it relates to the decline of "liberal" thinking at the Cape in the late 1800s. In particular figures such as John Phillip of the London Missionary Society became increasingly conservative and negatively (rather than positively) racist. This had partly to do with the violent series of "Frontier Wars" through which the British slowly annexed the land between Cape Town and KZN, finally achieving total control over it by the 1890s. The historical causes that lie behind such changes in attitude towards indigenous "others" are worth exploring in considerable detail. Perhaps you could comment on how it manifests in your discipline?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, nice to meet you too Lannie,well in geography we are concerned with both the spatial and human aspects of geography but in my experince, we tend to be biased towards the spatial, sometimes we are more concerned with the “how" than the “why". While we haven't covered South Africa's history in any broad scope, we have covered the period between the early 1900's up to the present in certain modules,a recurring theme in these modules is a loss of land, usually due to a colonial power, and the consequences thereof. My knowledge I have gained about racism and land loss through these particular modules is limited, but reading about Gustav Fritch's travels through South Africa has added another aspect to my knowledge about this time period and how it possibly contributed to a racially segregated South Africa.

      I hope this answer is satisfactory, if you want me to clear anything up then please ask :)

      Delete