Jean-Jacques Rousseau, born in
Geneva, was an 18th century philosopher and writer. Claude
Levi-Strauss, a French anthropologist and ethnologist, called Rousseau's Discourse on the Origins of
Inequality the beginning of anthropology. This was stated partly
because of it's self-questioning stance and partly because “of its
consideration of links between human and primate behaviour” (Glenn
62). Levi-Strauss sees Rousseau as the founder, while other
researches argue that Rousseau can be seen as the first Enlightenment
figure, supposing that there is a link between particular species,
“the relation between apes and men” (Glenn 63). Rousseau tried to
find the missing link between primate and man in his Discourse on
the Origins of Inequality (Glenn
63). Rousseau speculated that travellers who claim to have seen
primates that look like men might have been confused and seen animals
instead of men, these travellers might have judged simply on external
characteristics (Glenn 63). There are sections in Rousseau's
Discourse that
developed the idea that to move away from being savage to a more
civilised state it involves “a complex economy of sensory,
psychological and social losses and gains” (Glenn 64). This sense
of lost capacities and possibilities influenced both Levaillant and
Marias (Glenn 64).
The
French explorer Francois
Levaillant, an 18th
century travel writer, was a pioneering figure in South African
ornithology, zoology, and ethology as well as in anthropology (Glenn
65). Levaillant worked from what he found in the field, he felt that
Rousseau had a false and distorted view of the Hottentots. Levaillent
attacks Rousseau's work and views of the Hottentots and he criticised
Rousseau for “relying on second-hand accounts” from other writers
(Glenn 66). However, Levaillant's self-justification
in the “prière d'insérer” saw
himself as agreeing with Rousseau's challenge in finding a
“philosophy that travels” (Glenn 66). Levaillant seemed to
describe African people without prejudice and shared another view
with Rousseau, the idea of the “Noble savage” and the
condemnation of civilization. Levaillant had a relationship with a
Khoekhoe woman in Gonaqua called Narina, his relationship with her
would be frowned upon and seen as social unacceptable in the later
colonial period. “Levaillant's legacy to South African literature
of the nineteenth century was generally as a political critic of
colonialism” (Glenn 70). Levaillant was able to see the Hottentots
and Gonaquois as completely human, this meant that he worked with
“the conventions of classicism to depict black bodies as beautiful”
(Glenn 70).
Eugene
Marais, a South African
poet, writer and naturalist, is well-known for his contribution to
Afrikaans literature although, he is little less know for his
contribution to science. His book, Souls of the Ape, “aspires to
the high detached scientific tone,” which echoes Freud as Marais
recounts various experiments he performed in hypnosis (Glenn 72).
Marais' 19th
century reading of Darwin created a scale that put blacks closer to
baboons and was inevitably racist (Glenn 72). His central concern of
his theory of ethnology and anthropology was “the cost of the
transition from savage man to civilised, animal to human” (Glenn
73). Marais saw that there was an inherent weakness in the stage of
development and way of life for the Bushman (Glenn 73). It is ironic
that in his chapter “Addiction and Depression” - Marais comments
that the Bushman “may be closer to him, or the universal condition,
than the cynical exploiters” (Glenn 74). Marais discovered the Waterberg Cycad which was also named after him (Encephalartos eugene-maraisii). Marais is also known as the first person to study the behaviour of wild primates.
Works Cited:
Glenn, Ian. “Primate Time: Rousseau, Levaillant, Marais”. Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa, 18.1 (2011): 61-77. Print.
The main theme in the late 19th century literature “is the tension between high pretension and 'the horror' of primal drives and forces” (Glenn 75). Marais can be seen as being closer to Rousseau's work than Levaillant, in the sense of the movement of man from primate to savage (Glenn 75). Rousseau, Levaillant and Marais share different and similar findings in their work about the 'savage man'. It is interesting to note that although some saw the Hottentots as human, they were never seen as fully human.
Links:
Works Cited:
Glenn, Ian. “Primate Time: Rousseau, Levaillant, Marais”. Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa, 18.1 (2011): 61-77. Print.
Hi Thandi. Do you see parallels between the kinds of "evolutionary" thought that Schreiner deploys to consider the place in society of contemporary women, and the language used by Le Vaillant and Rousseau (pre- the theory of evolution) to consider the relationships between human societies, and between humans and apes? Its a big question - but there could be scope for a further posting here.
ReplyDeleteThanks for a detailed and interesting summary!
Thank you for this well written summary. It's quite interesting to read how these different men and their work are able to intersect at various points despite the vast difference in the time periods within which they worked. While Marais' work falls within the same vein as Le Vaillant and Rousseau, his work is conducted post evolution theory. How does this impact his work, if it does at all, compared to Le Vaillant and Rousseau who worked pre- the theory of evolution?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI can see the link between Schreiner's evolutionary thinking and Le Vaillant and Rousseau. Schreiner wanted a sexual freedom for women and argued that men and women are not that differently in their sexual desires. Through their language and writings Le Vaillant and Rousseau wanted to see little prejudice between African people and themselves and tried to look for similarities. This can be seen in how Schreiner argued her views on women and men.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comments.