In his article, Derek
Attridge engages the ethical force of literature in J. M. Coetzee’s, Dusklands, and, In the Heart of the Country. Attridge argues that both novels
engages the reader ethically, where the reader is encouraged to respond to an
event or situation where. “otherness challenges habitual norms” (Attridge
653). In this article Attridge focuses
on two key ideas:
1.
How powerful modernist techniques can be
used to involve the reader ethically, and;
2.
A discussion on how Coetzee undermines
conventional discourses that are used to represent servants (which I interpreted as characters) in the same way
he tests conventions of fictional representations.
Attridge explores these
ideas in both of Coetzee’s novels and begins with his discussion of Dusklands.
Attridge’s emphasis on, Duslkands, is that it focuses on
inviting the reader ethically into the novel and achieves this through the use
of parody, specifically, a parody of an actual event. There is an emphasis the
‘event’, and how this ‘event’ is represented through discourse to shape social
life. Dusklands, is split into two
novellas, the first focusing on Eugene Dawn in, “The Vietnam Project”, and the
second focusing on Jacobus Coetzee in, “The Narrative of Jacobus Coetzee”, where
each protagonist, according to Attridge, is given the ability to draw the
reader in through their actions within, and reflections regarding, events. Attridge’s
argument lies in the ‘event’ and how both of these characters, Eugene and
Jacobus, are written with conventional fictional representations and are placed
within the conventional discourses of 20th century American imperialism
and 18th century Dutch colonialism, respectively. These are
undermined, while also drawing the reader in ethically, when juxtaposed with
the ‘other’ within each of the novellas.
Attridge’s exploration
into, In the Heart of the Country, is
based on the techniques used by Coetzee and how narration is affected by these
techniques and develops. By numbering the paragraphs in the novel, the reader
is made aware of the language as a backdrop to human lives, thoughts
and feelings. A technique like this is simple, yet effective in changing the
effect of the narration and how narration is read. Attridge, explores how the
narration is flawed and how these flaws shapes the narrative. According to
Attridge, Coetzee also evokes a mental world that makes it easier for the
reader to experience the, “mimetic power of narrative”, which allows the reader
to sympathise with the feelings and thoughts of the imagined character. The
exposure of the flaws in narration, coupled with this evocation of a mental
world, allows for the sequence of events in the novel to develop in more than
one direction through narrative backtracking. What Attridge means by this is
that, one event is essentially developed into two or more separate events which
holds the different perspectives, thoughts and feelings of the characters
involved in the event.
While the article is
difficult to grab a hold of, and grapples with complex ideas, it is interesting
how Attridge unpacks how the ethical is represented and made effective in two
of J. M. Coetzee’s earliest novels.
Works cited
Attridge, Derek.
“Ethical Modernism: Servants as Others in J. M. Coetzee’s Early Fiction.” Poetics Today, 25:4 (2004): 553-671.
Gustav, you summarised the article beautifully. On a first reading of the article, I found the article dense and difficult to understand but I found the main points of the article in your post.
ReplyDeleteA few points and questions:
1. What are the modernist techniques that Attridge speaks about in relation to Dusklands and In the Heart of the Country?
2. How does Attridge discuss the “master and servant” relationship in Coetzee’s books (658)?
3. Attridge mentions the two novellas in Dusklands can “claim to be documentaries of sorts” one being an autobiographical account and the other being a scholarly publication (657)? Do you agree and why?
4. Attridge mentions that the dominant figure in the master-servant relationship is white but then he adds that “the language and the consciousness through which the servant’s world is mediated is the master’s” (658). He later mentions that the language thought of the servant (Toiing) represented “is that of his master and how it repeatedly declares the servant’s subservience” (659). [I found this an interesting point in the article.]
5. Attridge also mentions the “significant differences between two events” one of Magda being raped by Hendrik (which he calls “two rapes”) and another of the “double death” of Klawer (666). Could this be considered a narrative style of Coetzee and could it be seen as a modernist technique that Coetzee uses?
I picked up minor editorial mistakes in the post. There were just a few punctuation errors. Just be careful of your use of commas, I feel that you use too many commas in a sentence. Also see the placing of the comma in the sentence. The post is well written and enjoyable to read.